Smokey, much of the problem here is that Darwinists have projected the supernatural, intelligent design capabilities of God onto inanimate genetics.
Thus, you must attribute supernatural powers to genetics (while denying such), which I don't.This is why we have a problem with young engineers thinking that they will be able to do amazing things with GA. They are superstitious, unlike us more practical and worldly fundamentalists.
Emphasis mine. Wow....
Looney has made a couple more posts at his blog which are unintentionally hilarious, and I will deal with them in short order.
5 comments:
I stand by that claim: The new young engineers believe GA is superior to classical optimization in every way. This is a direct consequence of the teaching they receive in schools regarding the power of Darwinism. They are very superstitious.
"Darwinism".
Please give a definition.
"I stand by that claim: The new young engineers believe GA is superior to classical optimization in every way."
Then if you believe that God designed your immune system, since He used a GA as its foundation, you're smarter than God?
Heya, thanks for the link to the shallit paper on dembski. I had not read it before, though I had already concluded that Dembski's contributions to science and mathematics were far less than his contributions to religion. Shallit's piece is utterly devastating.
-- thefalliblefiend
Post a Comment