I've recently taken on additional duties at my place of employment, and so am taking a break from blogging (not that I was super active in the first place). I will placing comments on moderation so as to avoid junk posts and spam from accumulating.
See ya!
Commentary on the so-called Creation/Evolution/Intelligent Design Debate and Right-Wing nuttery in general - and please ignore the typos (I make lots!)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(41)
-
►
March
(8)
- Conservatives: Monumentally stupid or monumentall...
- David Scott Springer - tough guy for IDism
- "Intelligent Design" has NOTHING to do with religi...
- Conservative Christian Republican Sally Kern put i...
- Casey Luskin, propagandist for Christ
- Did OK on the Asvab? SATs? YOU TOO are therefore...
- Sally Kern - Why Southern Christian Conservatives ...
- Jonathan Wells - incompetent (liar?) for the Rev. ...
-
►
February
(7)
- Caroline Crocker: Victim of the Darwinist Establi...
- Surprised? Not me....
- Software developer PROVES that there is no junkDNA...
- INtelligent Design Creationists censoring scientis...
- Creation 'scientists' plagiarize, too
- FINALLY - Intelligent Design Scientists are puttin...
- bfast - another Salem Hypothesis datum point (or, ...
-
►
March
(8)
2 comments:
Going, going, gone -- as you would say. Just kidding, but I do have a serious question. You never actually stated how much DNA you think is really junk. Do you really think it is around 90%?
By the way, if you are ever in Seattle look me up and I'll give you a tour.
Hi Randy,
I answered that on your blog already, but no, I don't think it is in the 90% range and I don't recall saying it was.
Looks to be closer to the 50% range.
Thanks for the offer - same to you if you're ever in VT.
Post a Comment